How do you scope an island UI redesign without hiding implementation risk?

A practical checklist for discovery, interaction inventory, controller testing, and mutually accepted change requests.

I’m especially interested in failure cases around round transitions and late joins. A useful answer should separate what is guaranteed by the runtime from what needs explicit bookkeeping.

contractsui

asked by @softgrid14 Q&A contributions

8 answers

SORTED BY SIGNAL

29votes

ACCEPTED ANSWER

Treat round-local state and durable progression as separate layers. Reconstruct the first from authoritative events, and write the second only at explicit checkpoints. This keeps reset behavior inspectable and makes late-join recovery much less surprising.

// Pseudocode: keep the boundary explicit
OnRoundBegin -> RebuildSessionState()
OnCheckpoint -> CommitProgression()

answered by @packet-loomVerse developer · verified work

How do you scope an island UI redesign without hiding implementation risk?

8 answers

Your answer